![]() 2 of them would produce about 2800 RF/t in Monster, and use about 16 ingots of fuel to produce 100 million RF in total, as far as I can tell. That said, if you need to boost your RF/t output, it might actually be cheaper to build 2 7x7x3 reactors, since they don't need 20 diamond blocks to cool them, as per the 7x7x7 design in the spreadsheet. The 7x7x7 is of course much more expensive to build, but doesn't seem to burn much more fuel per RF. Typical Design Parameters for BNR Orbal/Oxidation Ditch. List your set of assumptions and prepare the general balance equations to suit them and your chosen reactor. The 7x7x7 produced 2400RF/t, at about 960 degrees, and when it was done, the output port had 8 cyanite ingotsĪs far as I can tell, within some minor variance, they used about the same amount of fuel to produce the same amount of RF. Usually two-stage reactor (anoxic/aerobic) would be sufficient to achieve BNR level of 8 mg/l. ![]() The 7x7x3 produced 1400RF/t, at about 700 degrees, and when it was done, the output port had 8 cyanite ingots The paper discusses the principle of operation of the new topologies which depends on thyristor switched reactors TSR. Based on this, the best bang for the buck for a water cooled reactor will be a 5x9x5 turbine with a 5 blocks high rotor (10 blades), 3 coils, the rest of the. So basically they ran until they produced 50 million RF, then shut off. This paper provides optimal design of new topologies of the thyristor controlled reactors TCR used in static VAR compensators systems SVC with zero harmonic content. I set them both up with redstone ports to turn them off when they reached 1% power reserves, and had them output to an empty resonant ender cell (50 million RF storage). Remember to keep the max flow rate at 2000 mB/t. The turbine (once up to speed) has 1782.7 RPM, 10140 RF/t. However, the flux flow loss becomes large at 77 K, and then it has to be taken into account at the design stage. This makes the reactor run at around 195 degrees Celsius, Produce around 3520/3530 mB/t. ![]() To operate at high temperature (77 K) makes the coolant cost low. ![]() Why does no one post that information with their designs?Įdit/Update: to that end, I built a 7x7x3 and a 7x7x7 reactor, based on the google doc design, in Monster 1.1.0 (a lower power mulitiplier in the config than Resonant Rise). The superconducting magnets of DC reactors can be operated at higher temperature than that of SMES, since the rated current in the case of DC reactors is much smaller. I just want to produce the most power per fuel that I can. Has anyone figured out an optimal setup with Big Reactors yet Feed the Beast Ive done a regular 114 with cryotheum but that cooled it way too much. Maybe I'm missing the point here, but while I understand the effect temperature has on production/efficiency, when I look for a reactor design I care about only 2 things: RF output, and fuel consumption in mB/tick. I see a lot of talk of temperature, but nobody is mentioning fuel consumption. I eventually settled on a 9-tile wide column design which produces 279.36 MW of power. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |